LISEE says 1995 referendum vote WILL NOT BE on SEPARATION
TRANSCRIPT:
Who is Lisée?
On Friday evening, October 7th, 2016 in Lévis, Québec, the Communist and unconstitutional Parti Québécois elected Communist Jean-François Lisée as its new leader. The Montreal Gazette online (October 8, 2016 updated 12:12) announced that on the second ballot Lisée “squeaked to victory with 50.63 per cent of the vote” with “a turnout of 75.09 per cent”, “higher than in the 2015 race”.
The mainstream (controlled media) of the corporate socialists will never tell Canadians that the PQ’s 1972 manifesto plans a Communist state of Quebec with devolution of powers to Soviet-style megacities on the model of Moscow. Nor have they told you that Lisée himself is a Communist.
Flashback:
In 1995, at the time of the Quebec referendum, Lisée is a hired advisor to the Communist Parti Québécois whose 1972 manifesto, in French only, reveals to party militants (the far-left) the PQ’s true hidden plans for a fully Communist state of Quebec (i.e., the PQ itself is far left, a fact suppressed from the news). Free enterprise will be abolished. There will be socialist planning conducted by expanded and revalorized metropolitan regions. A form of Yugoslav-style Communism will be implemented with worker self-management.
Jacques Parizeau, leading the de facto PQ government, put Lisée on staff, on taxpayer’s nickel, to be his 1995 referendum strategist. Lisée came up with:
[a] The tripartite agreement — a glitzy media-covered public “signing” by the three “separatist” political party leaders, of the scenario for Quebec “sovereignty” on a Yes. (Where there is no legal power to act, find an interesting “procedure” to distract the audience.)
[P.S. The third “separatist” leader, Mario Dumont, has no idea what’s really going on. He’s being conned and doesn’t know it].
[b] and, Lisée is credited with writing the 1995 referendum question (although it could just as well have been written in Washington).
P.S. again. The 1995 referendum was more than likely very highly rigged.
Conclusions:
Referendums on Quebec “sovereignty” have never been about “separation”; they’ve always been about blackmailing “the rest of Canada” into dismantling itself and adopting the European Union system.
In 1980, the referendum question was about “sovereignty association”, which did not mean Quebec “sovereignty”. It meant, in reality, the “associated state” status of European Economic Community member states.
In 1995, the word “association” was replaced by “partnership”, different label, same product, but in 1995 the EEC had become the European Union.
Meanwhile, the game is and has always been played to keep French Canadians confused, so they would believe that Quebec was “seceding” to become “sovereign”. In reality, in both referendums, the question should have been:
“Do you want to join Europe?”.
In 1978, two years after the Parti Québécois seized power under void oaths, the PQ produced a white paper entitled “L’Option Europe : Analyse de la plausibilité d’une association Québec / Canada / Europe,” of which the following is an excerpt:
Of course, all this takes place in the context of the North American Union, the North American version of the European Union, as evidenced by documents harvested from the web site of the North American Forum on Integration (NAFI), and collected here.
In fact, Communist Jean-François Lisée, featured in the video clip above, published the following photo and caption in his French-language book, “Dans l’œil de l’aigle : Washington Face au Québec ” (“In the Eye of the Eagle: Washington Faced With Quebec”), showing French President Charles De Gaulle on the balcony of Montreal City Hall on the day he shouted “Vive le Québec libre! (Long live free Quebec!). Lisée’s caption reads, “De Gaulle au balcon. Viser le Canada pour frapper les Etats-Unis? ” (“Target Canada to strike the United States?”) Was the (fictitious) Quebec “separatism” promoted by De Gaulle perhaps intended to also dismantle the United States, wonders Lisée, who obviously knew the answer.
(“Target Canada to strike the United States?”)